Number Rolled: 45
Movie Name/Year: Love
Actually (2003)
Genre: Romance
Length: 134
minutes
Rating: R
Director: Richard
Curtis
Writer: Richard
Curtis
Actors: Bill
Nighy, Gregor Fisher, Colin Firth, Liam Neeson, Emma Thompson, Kris Marshall,
Heike Makatsch, Martin Freeman, Joanna Page, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Andrew Lincoln,
Keira Knightley, Hugh Grant, Nina Sosanya, Martine McCutcheon, Laura Linney,
Abdul Salis, Thomas Brodie-Sangster, Alan Rickman, Rodrigo Santoro, Lucia
Moniz, Billy Bob Thornton, Rowan Atkinson, Elisha Cuthbert, January Jones,
Olivia Olson, Claudia Schiffer, Shannon Elizabeth, Denise Richards
Normally I start a blog with a basic synopsis of how the
movie begins. “Love Actually” doesn’t have a single clear beginning. In fact,
the film has ten different beginnings. Although it isn’t technically an
anthology, “Love Actually” takes ten different stories and ties them together
in the end. Not unlike some movies that followed it like: “New York, I Love You”
or “He’s Just Not That Into You.”
Since this movie came out I’ve heard nothing but good
things. Critics and audience members both seemed to love it, but I resisted. I
don’t mind the occasional romance story, but I tend to like it more with the
added plotline involving magic, explosions, assassins, horror, or just
generally dragons of some sort – literal or figurative. The way this film was
portrayed to me had me believing it was serious and heavily on the realistic
side. In other words, I completely got the wrong idea. It’s actually more of a
romantic comedy and, though it does have some basis in reality, it’s not stuck
on a serious note. Evidence of it has been removed from the film for the most
part, but one of the characters is even supposed to be an angel; an actual heaven-born
angel. That piece of trivia makes all the difference to me.
When I was a young child, I was really sick and not able to
do too much. My mother would bring home videos from a store where they sold the
tapes 10 for $10. I fell in love with the stories that helped me escape
reality. It’s probably why I don’t tend to go for heavy dramas or serious
romances.
I digress. “Love Actually” was a lot more simple and
relatable than I was led to believe. However, there was a lot of fluff and a
lot of characters. If you just glance over the credits I listed above, you’ll
see a LOT of BIG, familiar names. That’s because there were a lot of main
characters. In fact, I’m still having trouble remembering what name goes to
what character. I can’t tell you whether or not that’ll be a problem for you,
but I can tell you I couldn’t put a name to a face but I still enjoyed the
stories and the way they twisted together.
Richard Curtis pulled off a huge success for his first step
into directing and, I hate the term, he raised the bar for himself. I haven’t
seen his other two directions, but my expectations will be very high when I do.
Netflix’s Prediction for Me – 3.8/5
Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 63%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 73%
Trust-the-Dice Score – 4/5
P.S. Netflix gave me the following movies in the “more like
this” section of screen for “Love Actually”: “New York, I Love You,” “I Don’t
Know How She Does It,” “Mona Lisa Smile,” “Bachelorette,” “The Rebound,” “What
to Expect When You’re Expecting,” “She’s All That,” “The Kids Are All Right.”
Personally, I think their database is a little screwed because I’ve seen 6/8 of
those movies and the only one that actually belongs in that “more like this”
category is “New York, I Love You.”
Movie Trailer:
No comments:
Post a Comment