Streaming Service: Peacock
Movie Name/Year: Firestarter (2022)
Genre: Drama, Horror, Sci-Fi
Length: 1h 50min
Rating: R
Production/Distribution: Blumhouse Productions, Angry Adam Productions,
BoulderLight Pictures, Night Platform, Universal Pictures, Weed Road Pictures,
United International Pictures, Universal Pictures International, Peacock
Director: Keith Thomas
Writers: Scott Teems, Stephen King
Actors: Zac Efron, Michael Greyeyes,
Danny Waugh, Darrin Maharaj, Gavin MacIver-Wright, Gloria Reuben, Isaac Murray,
Kurtwood Smith, Lanette Ware, Neven Pajkic, Phi Huynh, Ryan Kiera Armstrong,
Shannon McDonough, Sydney Lemmon, Tina Jung, Vas Saranga
IMDb Blurb: A young girl tries to understand
how she mysteriously gained the power to set things on fire with her mind.
Cat’s Point of View:
I have been looking forward to this new remake of Firestarter, even if I have remained
torn as to whether or not it really should have been made in the first place.
It exists now, and I love the works of Stephen King (Christine, The Stand, IT), therefore it was a must-see for me. Firestarter was #6 on my May 2022 Top 20 list, afterall.
A new look at the Firestarter
story afforded a better opportunity for higher production value, given the effects
technology advances. The casting also seemed to be on point. Horror legend, John
Carpenter (Halloween, The Power of
Nightmares, Studio 666), also worked on the music for Firestarter. Bonus points awarded because it became available on
Peacock immediately upon release. Anyone who has access to the service wouldn’t
need to pay for a movie ticket should they still be on the fence. Win-win.
Before I get into the nuts and bolts of things, I don’t want
to bury the lead. I enjoyed this new version. I think it fixed a few of the
more problematic aspects present in the 1984 movie. Was it the best it could
have been? There was room for improvement. It wasn’t the most fantastic horror
movie I’ve ever seen – but I don’t think Firestarter
is deserving of the dismal ratings I’ve been seeing professional critics
lobbing around.
It has been quite a while since I read the book these
films were based on. Take that for what you will. I’m merely offering that I’m
unable to draw parallels between the Firestarter
movies and the original text. I can, however, offer a perspective between the
1984 and 2022 productions. I actually watched them back to back to offer a fresh
perspective.
The original Firestarter
wasn’t without its own problems. Fire effects weren’t so seamless and you could
see where the mechanisms were generating the flames, etc. Further, the father’s
psychic powers requiring all that head-squeezing was a little too over-the-top –but
hey, it was the ‘80s.
Today’s new iteration fixed some of this. Telekinetic and
pyrokinetic events flowed more seamlessly and enhanced the action rather than
distracting from it. I love how they reflected Zac Efron (The Lorax, The Greatest Showman, Gold) using his powers both in a
physical and effects-driven combination. Before I get further into the cast, I
feel I must give cheers and thanks for the production team updating the overall
time period of the setting and incorporating as well as addressing things such
as smartphones and the internet. While I adore nostalgia, this was definitely
not a place to remain in the past, since parallels were already going to be
drawn between the 1984 flick and this one. It needed more to stand apart, and
it delivered.
Let’s revisit the cast. Sydney Lemmon (Velvet Buzzsaw, Helstrom, Fear the Walking Dead) felt more
connected to the mother character than the original. The whole parental dynamic
felt more believable in the update. While I adore the original actor for young
Charlie McGee’s role, Ryan Kiera Armstrong (It
Chapter Two, Anne with an E, American Horror Story) fit the part and
delivered a strong and edgy performance.
In my Top 20 article blurb, I mentioned appreciation that
the role of Rainbird was cast to Michael Greyeyes (True Detective, Blood Quantum, Wildhood) – not only because he was
a phenomenal actor, but because he also fit the part as someone of Indigenous
American descent. I actually enjoyed his version of Rainbird more. The story made
more sense, felt more intense, and was definitely less creepy than the vibes
from George C. Scott (Dr. Strangelove,
Patton, Malice) in the original.
There were definitely some story tweaks between the two
iterations of Firestarter. I believe
this new version was an improvement. Of course, those wanting something more
literally ‘by the book’ would still likely find dismay in differences – but such
is the way.
We really got to dig into Charlie’s character more in the
new Firestarter. We saw her problems
and desire to just fit in like a normal kid – and how not being normal
magnified the horrific situation that even ‘regular’ kids find themselves in
with bullies and the like. Things got more personal and gritty rather than the
plushies, dolls, horseback riding, and video games that watered down the first
incarnation. While I love the innocence and naiveté of the original character,
the darker tone seemed to fit the trials her life had undergone in its short
span better.
I went on a little ramble here. The ratings I was seeing
frankly irked me, and I don’t think Firestarter
was as bad as the critics are making it out to be. Keep in mind that quite
literally some of these very same professional ‘Top Critics’ trashing Firestarter gave positive reviews adding
up to an over 90% rating for an unwatchable movie.
My recommendation is that if you like horror with a side of
sci-fi maybe give Firestarter a shot
and form your own opinion.
Rotten
Tomatoes Critic Score – 13%
Rotten
Tomatoes Audience Score – 46%
Metascore – 33%
Metacritic
User Score – None
IMDB
Score –4.9/10
P.S. - Trigger warning for cat (or animal) lovers. There is a graphic scene involving a cat.
Trust
the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 3.5/5
Movie
Trailer: