"We're not critics. We're professional fan-girls." --- This blog is dedicated to movies and the entertainment industry. We use random selection to bring into light the best and worst of streaming films and entertainment news.
Friday, November 24, 2017
Happy Thanksgiving!
Due to Thanksgiving, there won't be a post today. We hope you had a great holiday!
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
The Unborn (2009)
Number Rolled: 50
Movie Name/Year: The
Unborn (2009)
Tagline: Evil
will do anything to live.
Genre: Drama,
Horror, Mystery
Length: 87
minutes
Rating: PG-13
Production Companies:
Rogue Pictures, Platinum Dunes, Phantom Four, Relativity Media
Producer: Michael
Bay, William S. Beasley, Jessika Borsiczky, Andrew Form, Bradley Fuller
Director: David
S. Goyer
Writer: David S.
Goyer
Actors: Odette
Annabel, Gary Oldman, Cam Gigandet, Meagan Good, Idris Elba, Jane Alexander,
Atticus Shaffer, James Remar, Carla Gugino, C.S. Lee, Rhys Coiro, Michael
Sassone, Ethan Cutkosky
Stunt Doubles: Nicole
Callender, Marie Fink, Carl Paoli, Dave Pope, Deep Roy, Jeff Shannon, Jodi
Starnes, Mark Steger, Rich Wilkie
Blurb from Netflix:
Tortured by frightening dreams at night and a young boy’s ghost during the day,
a teen turns to a spiritual adviser for help in this eerie thriller.
Selina’s Point of View:
A friend of mine warned me about this film about a year or
two ago.
I can handle a lot in my horror films. Torture sequences don’t
do much to me, neither do most jump scares. I have an issue with eyes and I
have an issue with fetuses. Between the two of them, there was a lot for my
friend to warn me about. Many of the horror scenes were based around my particular
issues, which made this an incredibly difficult film for me to watch.
In general, if I didn’t have my particular brand of issues,
I wouldn’t say it was all that different on the fear factor level than any
other non-found-footage paranormal movie out there. It was mostly jump scares. Pretty
much Exorcism 101.
The graphics, however, were kind of cool. There were a few
things that could have looked corny, but they wound up having a more realistic
touch to them that kept me from rolling my eyes.
There were some scenes that I feel didn’t made sense in the
context of the story… and that did pull me out of it just a little bit. Not
enough to dislike the movie, but enough to keep me from really being wowed.
Altogether, I’d say it’s a strong supernatural thriller with
horror components. I might think to recommend it to someone with taste that
goes in that direction.
Cat’s Point of View:
When you think of Michael Bay (I Am Number Four, Pain & Gain, Black Sails), it doesn’t exactly
bring the horror genre to mind. There were no explosions or any of the other
tropes that he’s well-known for. Then again, he was just a producer for this
film.
The writing and directing credits go to the brilliant David
S. Goyer (Batman Begins, The Invisible,
Da Vinci's Demons). His body of work proves that he has a firm grasp on
things dark and disturbing – things this film had in spades.
Seriously, there are a couple of scenes that will likely
give me nightmares – again.
That’s right. Again. This wasn’t the first time I’ve watched
this movie. It was more like the third or fourth time. I can’t remember which,
but does it really matter? I was fairly giddy when the dice gave it to us this
time. It doesn’t get old for me.
The creep-factor is real.
Unlike the film we reviewed for you last, this movie draws
you into a cohesive story with interesting and engaging characters. For a
minute, you might look at the young people and roll your eyes a bit with an
‘it’s going to be one of THOSE’ feeling – but then it takes a jog to the left.
These, for the most part, weren’t flat stereotypes.
Can we talk cast here? The production team pulled out the
big guns with Gary Oldman (Planet 51, The
Book of Eli, Darkest Hour) and Idris Elba (No Good Deed, Beasts of No Nation, Molly's Game). You can look on
IMDb and clearly see that Odette Annable (Cloverfield,
House, The Truth About Lies) is a busy lady, as well. I can certainly see
why. I’d have to say that it’s not often that a character in a movie
simultaneously brings the thoughts ‘awww’ and ‘holy shit’ to mind; but Cam Gigandet
(Pandorum, Easy A, Red Sky) pulled
that one off here with his role as Mark.
If you’re looking for a solid movie with some roots in
folklore and seriously creeptastic content, give this one a shot.
Languages
Speech Available:
English
Subtitles Available:
English
Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 10%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 30%
Metascore - 30/100
Metacritic User Score – 5.1/10
IMDB Score – 4.8/10
Trust the Dice: Selina’s Rating – 3/5
Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating
– 4/5
Movie Trailer:
Monday, November 20, 2017
Ouija Experiment 2: The Ouija Resurrection (2015)
Number Rolled: 20
Movie Name/Year: Ouija
Experiment 2: The Ouija Resurrection (2015)
Tagline: Hell
will be unleashed.
Genre: Horror
Length: 84
minutes
Rating: NR
Production Companies:
La Luna Entertainment
Producer: Stuart
Alson, Nicole Holland, Felix McNulty, Hareendra Samarasekera, Tom Zembrod
Director: Israel
Luna
Writer: Israel
Luna
Actors: Justin
Armstrong, Gerald Crum, Sally Greenland, Ty Larson, Swisyzinna, Shanon Snedden,
Jessica Willis, Eric Window, Eric Zettina, Tom Zembrod, Israel Luna, Chaselyn
Wade, Nicole Holt
Stunts: Tom
Zembrod
Blurb from Netflix:
Audience members become hostages trapped in a theater when a rapacious spirit
is summoned through a Ouija board and set on the loose.
Selina’s Point of View:
I normally love watching movies. Hell, it’s why I first got
it in my head to start this blog in the first place. Even if the film I’m
watching isn’t particularly good, I find some amusement in the awfulness.
I didn’t here. I found Ouija
Experiment 2: The Ouija Resurrection to be completely pointless – much like
the redundancy of the original title. Of course, IMDb has the newer title on
file – The Ouija Experiment 2: Theatre of
Death – which is much better. If only they’d made similar changes to the
film.
The only good thing I can say about it, is that it works as
a stand-alone film. Although it’s a sequel, they added a kind of ‘previously on’
that fit into the story relatively well. Unfortunately, it was a terrible
story.
That’s all the good I’ve got. The rest of the news is very
bad.
The acting was absolutely ridiculous. Not in a funny way,
either. It was just incredibly painful to watch. The acting was even paired
with an awful script. I rolled my eyes so hard at one point that I actively
gave myself a headache.
I get what the film makers were trying to do here. It was
supposed to be a meta jokingly-egotistical take on the first film, but that’s
not how it came off. It felt like a fully narcissistic step in the wrong
direction.
To make it worse, there were times I could swear the entire
thing had been recorded on an old phone. There was horrific video and sound
quality.
There’s not much else I can say. It was just… bad.
Cat’s Point of View:
In my review of The
Ouija Experiment (2011), which we covered back in July of 2016, I expressed
my hope that we wouldn’t land on its sequel. Well, here we are – with the
sequel.
My primary gripes about the first movie seem to be about
shaky cam, a soap opera atmosphere, and boredom resulting from my lack of being
able to engage with the movie. I’m happy to report that history didn’t entirely
repeat itself.
There were a few camera sequences that felt a bit spastic,
but I was immensely relieved that they stepped away from the found-footage
theme for this one. The soapy melodrama was also ditched, but I’m not sure if
what it was replaced with was much better. There was some seriously stilted
dialogue going on here. Some of it was painfully awkward beyond the cringe that
seemed to be purposeful in the scene.
I wasn’t entirely bored with this one, and they did catch me
with a few jump scares, but I still had trouble engaging with the characters. I
think a chunk of that was due to the writing, or perhaps production choices.
Some of the tale felt a bit disjointed. The background music choices did help
add a little tension to the atmosphere, but all told it just wasn’t that scary.
For example, what was up with the accent Sally Greenland (Misfire, Terminal Legacy, Dawn Patrol)
was using?
I’m not very familiar with her as an actress, and IMDb is rather
lacking on bio info, so I’m not sure if that’s her real accent and the writing
mislabeled it as British or if she was trying for British and it just sounded
like Aussie.
I did like the twist that brought Swisyzinna (Wops the Movie, Deceptions of Love, Lady
Luck), Justin Armstrong (Art of
Survival, Allegiance of Powers, Ghost Note), and Eric Window (In the Land of Fireworks, Sideline
Confessions, Carter High) back as themselves on a promo tour for their
small budget film.
It felt like an interesting fourth-wall break for the
original movie after-the-fact.
For a film that cost less than $1,000.00 to make, I’d say
they did a decent job. A lot of that
success can likely be attributed to multi-faceted crew members such as Gerald
Crum (Velvet Vengeance, Lake Fear, Blood
Vow) who worked on set decorations, the sound department, and lighting – in
addition to acting in the role of Danny.
I’m not entirely happy about this movie. It’s a toss-up as
to whether I even liked it any better than the first. Needless to say, a
snowball in Hades has a better chance than this film of getting a
recommendation from me.
Languages
Speech Available:
English, Brazilian Portuguese, Spanish
Subtitles Available:
English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, French, Spanish
Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – None
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 4%
Metascore - None
Metacritic User Score – None
IMDB Score – 1.9/10
Trust the Dice: Selina’s Rating – 1/5
Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating
– 1.5/5
Trust-the-Dice’s
Parental Advisory Rating: PG-13
Movie Trailer:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)