Jurassic World: Rebirth (2025)

Movie Name/Year: Jurassic World: Rebirth (2025)
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Length:  2h 13min
Rating: PG-13
Director: Gareth Edwards
Writers: Michael Crichton, David Koepp
Actors: Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, Jonathan Bailey, Rupert Friend, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Luna Blaise, David Iacono, Audrina Miranda, Philippine Velge, Bechir Sylvain, Ed Skrein, Adam Loxley, Niamh Finlay

IMDb Blurb: Five years post-Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), an expedition braves isolated equatorial regions to extract DNA from three massive prehistoric creatures for a groundbreaking medical breakthrough.

Cat’s Point of View:
The fact that I wanted to watch Jurassic World: Rebirth pretty much went without saying. I am down for any trip into the universe created by the belated Michael Crichton. I adored the 2 books that spawned this expansive franchise, and I’ve been in love with the movies – every single one of them.

I know, I know… they messed with the plot from the books and have taken things into different directions. Not only that, not every foray into the world of these genetically engineered dinos has had the most effective plot. I don’t care about all of that. I love the thrill of watching the meticulously executed dinosaurs on the screen interacting with the modern world.

I will never forget my first experience with Jurassic Park (1993). It was the first movie I was dropped off to watch with a friend without an adult present. I had already read the books and I was so awestruck by what I saw on the screen that I didn’t care there were differences between the page and the production. I left the theater easing back from my adrenaline rush and awash in the glow of being mesmerized by the magic of the special effects.

Even to this day, this series holds a special place in my heart and I will stop and watch any of them, even if I catch them in the middle – especially that first Jurassic Park. They’re comfort movies for me.

Jurassic World: Rebirth brought me back to some of those more primal feelings and reminded me about my love for this franchise. There were moments that were heartwarming, awe inspiring, and the tension was also on point. It checked the box of plans going sideways unexpectedly, and I even accidentally squeezed my daughter’s hand too tightly during a particularly harrowing scene.

If there was one thing that I missed from the original book that wasn’t in the first movie, it was the river encounter. The 3^rd installment of the original trilogy did somewhat remedy the omissions with its aviary and river scenes. If you thought that the trip along the river in Jurassic Park III (2001) was even a little scary, though, hold on to your proverbial hat for Jurassic World: Rebirth. I had white knuckles and what felt like heart palpitations.

One of the themes that I really enjoyed about Rebirth was that it paid homage to the original Jurassic Park movie in so many ways. I was delighted by all of the Easter eggs that were sprinkled throughout the entire movie. It seemed to live up to the promise of a fresh start in the wake of the Jurassic World (2015) trilogy conclusion. Jurassic World: Rebirth showed that it is, indeed, possible to move forward with stand-alone stories that don’t depend on legacy characters, dinosaurs, or even locations. We're all just living in a fully immersive world where dinosaurs are now a fixture of life on the planet.

If you love the Jurassic Park franchise or are even curious about it and haven’t seen the 6 prior movies, Jurassic World: Rebirth would offer an excellent cinematic experience for you. It can be enjoyed on its own, or with the knowledge carried forward that lets the subtle reminders of the past layer in some extra depth.

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 52%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score –72%
Metascore – 50%
Metacritic User Score – 5.5/10
IMDB Score – 6.2/10

Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 4.5/5

Movie Trailer:

Fear Street: Prom Queen (2025)

Streaming Service: Netflix
Movie Name/Year:  Fear Street: Prom Queen (2025)
Genre: Horror, Mystery, Thriller
Length:  1h 30min
Rating: R
Director: Matt Palmer
Writers: Matt Palmer, Donald McLeary, R.L. Stine
Based On: Fear Street book series by R.L. Stine
Actors: India Fowler, Suzanna Son, Fina Strazza, Katherine Waterston, Lili Taylor, Chris Klein, Ariana Greenblatt, David Iacono, Darrin Baker, Ella Rubin, Rebecca Ablack, Ilan O'Driscoll, Ryan Rosery, Damian Romeo, Dakota Taylor, Luke Kimball, Eden Summer Gilmore, Brennan Clost, Cecilia Lee, Joseph Chiu, Tom Keat, Dale Whibley, Christopher B. MacCabe, Joanne Boland, J.D. Nicholsen, Colin Platt, Alexander Eling, Jai Jai Jones

IMDb Blurb: When the "it" girls competing for prom queen at Shadyside High start to disappear, a gutsy outsider discovers she's in for one hell of a prom night.

Cat’s Point of View:
On the heels of taking a look at the Fear Street trilogy, it was only natural for us to bring you a review for the latest installment of book adaptations from R.L. Stine’s Fear Street series.

Fear Street: Prom Queen took place on the Shadyside timeline between the 1978 camp massacre and the 1994 events. Sara Fier’s curse was still in full effect during the events of this teen slasher – though it wasn’t the focus of this story, as it was in the trilogy.

This movie was quite the trip through nostalgia for me. Thankfully, it wasn’t the blood, guts, and trauma. The big hair that defied gravity with aid from copious amounts of hairspray, the fashion, and the idioms of the time were spot-on. It was like I was back in 1988 again for a little while. I had a real laugh out loud moment when I heard the phrase “gag me with a spoon!” (That was a real saying back in the day. I might have said it a time or two…or three.)

Fear Street: Prom Queen both played with familiar horror tropes and teen slasher camp, and offered us something new. It was a love letter to movies like I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997), Scream (1996), and Carrie (1976)… sort of put through a blender with Mean Girls (2004). I wasn’t mad at it, either.

I really enjoyed a few of the inventive kills by the red-raincoat slasher. The heavy-duty paper cutter desk machete was a brilliant murder tool. A hint of that was shown in the trailers and it was something that actually got me excited for the movie, and interested in new twists and turns were in store. Seriously, every kid has looked sideways at that dangerous contraption because we know that thing is capable of taking off fingers… or more.

We do need to address the proverbial elephant in the room, however. Fear Street: Prom Queen has gotten some rather low ratings across the board. A lot of the key complaints focused on character building and having enough to invest us in the plight of the characters.

I feel like Prom Queen suffered by comparison to the trilogy from 2021. There were 3 whole movies where we got to know those characters and what they were going through, with whole movies devoted to back-story. Prom Queen focused on new characters that weren’t featured in the trilogy, so we were having to glean info on the fly rather than having all the details spoon-fed over multiple installments.
Personally, I thought that the balance was fine between the current events of the film and flashes of background. There were breadcrumbs to follow. I fell for a couple red herrings along the way. The twist was fantastic and had me palming my forehead.

This was a solid offering for a retro teen slasher. The acting was good, the killings unhinged, and it was a generally accurate time capsule for the era it depicted. If this sort of thing is your cup of tea, or maybe rather spiked punch, I’d encourage you to give it a try.

Fans of Stine’s Fear Street series do have at least 2 more films to look forward to, according to R.L. Stine’s interview with The Hollywood Reporter. I can’t wait to see which one’s next.

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 28%
Rotten Tomatoes Popcorn Meter Score – 24%
Metascore – 41%
Metacritic User Score – 4.3/10
IMDB Score – 5.1/10

Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 3.5/5

Movie Trailer:

Fear Street: Part Three - 1666 (2021)

Streaming Service: Netflix
Movie Name/Year: Fear Street: Part Three - 1666 (2021)
Original Title: Fear Street: 1666
Genre: Horror, Mystery
Length:  1h 54min
Rating: R
Director: Leigh Janiak
Writers: R.L. Stine, Kate Trefry, Phil Graziadei, Leigh Janiak
Based On: Fear Street book series by R.L. Stine
Actors: Kiana Madeira, Elizabeth Scopel, Benjamin Flores Jr., Randy Havens, Julia Rehwald, Matthew Zuk, Fred Hechinger, Michael Chandler, Sadie Sink, Emily Rudd, Olivia Scott Welch, Lacy Camp, McCabe Slye, Ashley Zukerman, Jordana Spiro, Jeremy Ford, Charlene Amoia, Mark Ashworth, Todd Allen Durkin, Ryan Simpkins, Ted Sutherland, Gillian Jacobs, Darrell Britt-Gibson

IMDb Blurb: In 1666, a colonial town is gripped by a witch hunt that has deadly consequences for centuries to come, while teenagers in 1994 try to put an end to their town's curse before it is too late.

Cat’s Point of View:

The third and final act of Netflix’s Fear Street trilogy made for a satisfying book-end to the three-film run of this story.

The first movie sparked so many questions, and the second offered few answers, whetting the appetite for more. Fear Street Part Three: 1666 offered not only an origin story to this tale of a curse enveloping twin cities, but also a fitting resolution in the “present day” where the narrative began in 1994.

Part Three offers revelations that aren’t quite as shocking as they likely were intended to be, and yet the twisty shenanigans still entertained.

I understand some of the detractors from this third installment complaining that it felt like this was 2 whole movies smushed together. In some ways, it could be seen that way. I, however, appreciate the way that the extended flashback occurred. It more viscerally brought us into the story of the origins of the curse that befell Shadyside. It pulled our present-day characters into the parallel scenario of the past.

The setting of 1666, while likely a year selected for the numerical significance with its dark connotations, did fall in a period of time when witch fever was still high between the general timeline of The Burning Times in Europe and the Salem Witch Trial era in the 1690s. The segment from the past felt plausible and harrowingly fitting to that time period.

The transition between the past and the present were done well. I enjoyed seeing how the familiar faces wove into the past and brought the situation in 1994 into greater focus.

Of course, the climax was as campy as you would expect based on the build-up from the first 2 teen slasher installments. There was still plenty of blood to be spilled and inventive plans to be hatched.

Over all, I really enjoyed the entirety of the experience of this trilogy. I do strongly suggest that anyone interested in Fear Street Part Three: 1666 go back and watch the movies in order. Just a reminder that they are a continuous story from Part 1 through Part 3. Netflix does offer skippable recaps, but why read the Cliff’s Notes when the whole of the tale is so entertaining? Each movie ends with a “to be continued,” and is nicely concluded with this third installment.

Sometimes trilogies don’t pay off in the way you would hope, and leave questions and missed opportunities in their wake. This was not the case with the Fear Street trilogy encompassing 1994, 1978, & 1666.

If you’re a fan of R.L. Stine’s work, or the nostalgic horror of campy teen slasher flicks, this trilogy and specifically its conclusion will be right up your alley.

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 89%

Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 76%
Metascore – 68%
Metacritic User Score – 6.5/10
IMDB Score – 6.6/10

Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 4.5/5

Movie Trailer:

Fear Street: Part Two - 1978 (2021)

Streaming Service: Netflix
Movie Name/Year: Fear Street: Part Two - 1978 (2021)
Genre: Horror, Drama, Mystery
Length: 1h 49min
Rating: R
Director: Leigh Janiak
Writer: Leigh Janiak, Zak Olkewicz, Phil Graziadei, R.L. Stine
Actors: Gillian Jacobs, Kiana Madeira, Benjamin Flores Jr., Olivia Scott Welch, Sadie Sink, Brandon Spink, Chiara Aurelia, Marcelle LeBlanc, Eden Campbell, Ted Sutherland, Michael Provost, Drew Scheid, Emily Rudd, McCabe Slye, Jordana Spiro, Ashley Zukerman
 
Blurb from IMDb: Shadyside, 1978. School's out for summer and the activities at Camp Nightwing are about to begin. But when another Shadysider is possessed with the urge to kill, the fun in the sun becomes a gruesome fight for survival.

 
Selina's Point of View:
We're catching up on the Fear Street movies we missed, so expect part three next week. Cat and I discussed it, and we couldn't believe we had skipped reviewing these. It was an easy choice to fix that oversight. R.L. Stine was childhood for both of us.
 
It was a great idea for the three parts to be released in the same month, since two and three start where the last left off. It keeps the movies fresh in the mind of audiences. When there's a situation like this, where it all leads into each other, this should be common practice. Think about how much better it would have been to watch something like The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 (2014) at the beginning of the month and then The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 (2015) at the end of the same month if they'd come out the way the first three Fear Streets did. There could have been special showings where theaters put them back-to-back with a short intermission for bathroom breaks. I would have paid out the nose for that.
 

But I digress.
 
Like in the first part, Fear Street felt nostalgic. It followed all the horror movie rules that we once had laid out for us in Scream (1996), and it had the familiar setting that we saw in Friday the 13th. It also has that distinct R.L. Stine flair to it, though I'm sure the movie took liberties with the original material.
 
I did like part one a little better, though not enough to make a difference. They're on equal footing with story, and slightly campy acting, but the kills in part one were much more creative. Part two was bloodier though. It depends what you want from your slasher flick.
 
I look forward to seeing how the third movie ties in, and if there actually is an end to Sara Fier. R.L. Stine's endings aren't always happy. That makes it a little difficult to predict.
 

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 88%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 81%
Metascore – 61%
Metacritic User Score – 7.0
IMDB Score – 6.7/10
 
Trust the Dice: Selina's Rating – 3.5/5
 
P.S. Don't look at the IMDb page before watching the movie, it spoils something.
 
Movie Trailer:

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)

 

 

Movie Name/Year: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)

Genre: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy, Sci-Fi

Length:  1h 55min

Rating: PG-13 

Director: Gil Kenan 

Writers: Gil Kenan, Jason Reitman, Ivan Reitman, Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis 

Actors: Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Bill Murray, Annie Potts, William Atherton, Paul Rudd, Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace, Kumail Nanjiani, Patton Oswalt, Celeste O'Connor, Logan Kim, Emily Alyn Lind, James Acaster, Chris Tummings, Kevin Mangold, Ian Whyte, Natalie Cousteau, Allison McKay 

 

IMDb Blurb: When the discovery of an ancient artifact unleashes an evil force, Ghostbusters new and old must join forces to protect their home and save the world from a second ice age. 

 

 

Cat’s Point of View: 

There was really no question that I wanted to watch Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire as soon as physically and fiscally possible. I mean, it was my #1 pick for my March 2024 Top 20 article, after all. When a friend offered me a chance with an invite to an early matinee this past Tuesday afternoon, my response included “I’ll get the popcorn.”

 

I loved every second of this new sequel.

 

My friend had a slightly different take on it, but they seem to have taken one of the trailers a little too literally and were hoping for a spin leaning further into horror than comedy. This made for an interesting debate as we exited the theater. I countered with the fact that while the trailer teased that “every ghost they’ve ever caught will be unleashed” that it didn’t promise that they’d be fighting all or even the majority of them. That wouldn’t have even been feasible within the time constraints. That might be a great plot for a spin-off series – but it would have pulled away from concentrating on the big bad that earned this sequel’s frosty title.

 

 

Further, that the goofy comedy was a key aspect of this franchise going back to the very beginning. It’s meant to be family fun, if a little on the spicy side. Thus, of course, the PG-13 rating for Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021) as well as this new installment. The original 1984 Ghostbusters came in under the wire within a month or so from when they even began to split the PG rating into a more advanced category. (I think the first sequel dodged the bullet with fewer sexual overtones and a more fantastical plot involving the pink goo taking away some of the intensity.)

 

To both points, as well, the note about “every ghost” was an ominous portent that did set up the plot elements that tied into the concept where failure to learn from history would make you doomed to repeat it. There were some excellent moments of déjà vu that I quite enjoyed as events unfolded. It also stood to reason that not all of the specters released in the original containment breach would have been caught in the interim; as well as not every spirit involved in the dirt farm incident was sealed away when Gozer was. I absolutely adored and delighted in each and every ghostly cameo.

 

 

I also had great appreciation for the fact that Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire provided such a seamless, if a little time-advanced – continuance from where Afterlife and its mid-credits scene left off. There didn’t need to be a lot of exposition into what was going on or how things got to where they were. Everything just worked – including the connections between original cast and new.

 

I was also very relieved that they didn’t try to bring ghostly Egan back again. There was one scene where I was worried, but it was a proving point that they wanted to honor him in a different way and moved forward to something else advancing the new plot.

 

I have realized that I generally agree with a fan theory that believes that Egan’s “spirit” – figuratively, rather than literally this time – within the team lives on with Winston’s head tech guy Lars, played by James Acaster (Cinderella, Springleaf, Seize Them!). He has the whole vibe of Egan’s character within The Real Ghostbusters (1986-1991) animated series, both on an aesthetic and team contribution level. It is clear that they were by no means trying to replace him or say that this new guy was some sort of stand-in, however. I took it as a natural progression out of necessity to fill the tech development void left with his passing, and a nod to other aspects of the Ghostbusters universe that just don’t often get acknowledgement. I loved that animated series and watched it religiously. I even have the #1 of the comic that was a spin-off from the cartoon. There were actually several elements within Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire that referenced (if sometimes loosely) plot and equipment details from the series. There’s nothing that officially solidifies that particular concept, as far as I know – but for now, it’s my own head-canon.

 

 

There were several other new characters that made a big impact within Frozen Empire. Kumail Nanjiani (Stuber, Welcome to Chippendales, Destroy All Neighbors), Emily Alyn Lind (Replicas, Doctor Sleep, The Babysitter: Killer Queen), and Patton Oswalt (Mystery Science Theater 3000, Heroes of the Golden Masks, Manhunt) are welcome additions to the franchise, and I really appreciated how each of their characters contributed to this story – whether on a plot or emotional level.

 

Gil Kenan (Monster House, Scream: The TV Series, Ghostbusters: Afterlife) has done a phenomenal job with these last 2 movies, and I can only hope that he continues to bring us stories from this beloved franchise. I also appreciate that he has maintained a dedication to continuing the vision that the creative minds that have come before him brought to us – as well as keeping up with a usage of practical effects wherever possible. There’s a really informative interview he did with Collider that goes into so much more, as well. (He has gone on record, as well, stating that he did want to incorporate elements from other corners of the Ghostbusters universe – such as the animated series within these new stories. The article is a good read.)

 

As you can tell, I’m extremely passionate about my Ghostbusters fandom. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire ticked all the required boxes on my personal approval checklist. If you’ve been a fan of the old-school cast or even the animated series, chances are you’re going to adore this new installment, too.

 

 

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 44%

Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – 84%

Metascore – 46%

Metacritic User Score – 5.7/10

IMDB Score – 6.5/10

 

Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 5/5

 

P.S. – There is a mid-credit scene following this movie, but no further scenes after the credits end.

 

Movie Trailer:

Riddle of Fire (2024)

 

 

Movie Name/Year: Riddle of Fire (2024)

Genre: Action, Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy

Length:  1h 53min

Rating: PG-13

Director: Weston Razooli

Writer: Weston Razooli

Actors: Lio Tipton, Charles Halford, Weston Razooli, Lorelei Olivia Mote, Austin Archer, Abigail Sakari, Phoebe Ferro, Charlie Stover, Danielle Hoetmer, Rachel Browne, Skyler Peters, Andrea Browne, Lonzo Liggins, Chuck Marra, Colleen Baum, Sohrab Mirmont, Kent Richards

Film Website: www.riddleoffirethemovie.com

 

IMDb Blurb: Three mischievous children embark on a woodland odyssey when their mother sends them on an errand.

 

Selina’s Point of View:

The trailer for Riddle of Fire was interesting if a bit cutesy. So, that’s what I was mostly expecting from the film. A cute little fairy tale, with a little-kid twist to it. Possibly with the shock value that comes with kids causing havoc and doing things you’d mostly expect from teens.

 

Instead of something simple, funny, and cute – I got something that was deep and full of whimsy. A fairy tale that had an air of danger. It was so much better than I’d even hoped. That says a lot, because it made #8 on my Top 20 movies to look out forin March. My hopes were already high.

 

I love the way Riddle of Fire was shot. There was a constant green tint that gave everything a very Celtic flair. It made the use of fairies and witches seem at home, though the magical language seemed to be Greek. It was a mash-up of lore that worked to make something that carried an ethereal feel to it.

 

There’s no way I can talk about Riddle of Fire without including my thoughts about Lio Tipton (Warm Bodies, Vengeance, Why Women Kill). I adore them. I think Tipton is extremely under-rated. They are one of those actors I would follow to just about any project. I have since Crazy, Stupid, Love (2011) – despite most of their scenes in that movie being written in such a cringey way that I have to hide through the second-hand embarrassment the whole time.

 

I digress.

 

 

Lio Tipton has a range that not a whole lot of actors can boast. If you look at their early career, it seemed as if they were going to be typecast – but something sent that off the track and now you can really see how well they do just about everything. Their performance in Riddle of Fire was flawless.

 

Where kids’ acting is something I opt to only discuss in certain situations, I don’t mind talking about it here.

 

Naturally, kids are less experienced, and you need to have a different set of expectations for them. That’s just a fact. The kids in Riddle of Fire fit the feel of the film. I believed what they were selling me enough that their performances felt right for the fairy tale setting.

 

Weston Razooli (Anaxia, Jolly Boy Friday, Trials of the Red Mystic) made their full-length debut in Riddle of Fire. It’s a hell of a statement. There’s a bit of a tweak that can be made here or there, a scene that could be removed or altered, but it’s a damn fine debut. It’s high quality and feels as if a much more experienced director was at the helm. I will absolutely be looking out for more from him in the future.

 

I would recommend Riddle of Fire to anyone with a love for fairy tales.

 

 

Cat’s Point of View:

I absolutely adored Riddle of Fire.

 

That being said, I did have a few reservations when I first watched the trailer. I wasn’t sure where the film would land on the scale of watchability or if the story would come together. I had a few questions, but I was intrigued, and very excited that we got a chance to take an early peek at Riddle of Fire to offer a review.

 

This story is a bit of a re-imagining and twist on the “kids with bikes” adventure genre. These particular kids had dirt bikes rather than traditional bicycles, and they were armed with paintball guns rather than slingshots or home-made gadgets. I appreciated this new spin.

 

I was struck with some serious nostalgia as I watched Riddle of Fire. It was a bit of a time capsule bringing me back to a time when kids had more freedom (and general safety) to roam during the summer and get into all sorts of shenanigans. We just had to be back home before dinner.

 

Riddle of Fire was whimsical with its touches of fantasy – right down to the Celtic-like font that illustrated the credits and necessary captions and even the, what sounded like, Greek (if not Greek-adjacent) words of magic. It was a tale of immortal reptiles, bandits, and nomad fairies.  There was even a challenging quest for a special potion of healing in the form of a pie, which offered an excellent framework for the adventure to unfold.

 

I loved the humor and the thrill of the hunt, as well as the potential danger that the kids found themselves in. It was a test and testimonial for their friendship. The story stirred so many heartwarming feelings. Even the way that Riddle of Fire was filmed was an excellent strategy to deliver this modern fairytale. 

 

 

The fact that Lio Tipton (Warm Bodies, Why Women Kill, Vengeance) was involved with the film was another draw for me and one of the sparks for my initial interest in this production. I’ve been a fan of theirs from figure skating to America's Next Top Model (2003-2018) and into acting. Their journey has been a joy to watch and I really appreciate the depth they brought to their character here in Riddle of Fire. I was actually intimidated by the intensity of the look in their eyes at a few points.

 

When kids are involved – especially generally fresh and untested talent – things can be a bit unpredictable and sometimes the performances don’t quite hit the right note. It's just a bit of performance roulette that comes with the territory. In this case, the lack of some polish just enhanced the wild and unsupervised freedom of these mischief makers within the story.

 

Weston Razooli (The Book of Three Snakes, Trials of the Red Mystic, Jolly Boy Friday) really knocked this out of the park as a feature film debut as writer and director. I was, frankly, surprised that this was his first full-length outing. Of course, Riddle of Fire wasn’t flawless, but that just means he has so much room to grow into his craft. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

 

Riddle of Fire will be reaching theaters with a limited release premiering Friday, March 22^nd. I’ll definitely be rooting for this movie and hope it performs well.

 

Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – 89%

Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score –None

Metascore – 49%

Metacritic User Score – None

IMDB Score – 7.0/10

 

Trust the Dice: Selina’s Rating – 4/5

Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 4/5

 

Movie Trailer: