"We're not critics. We're professional fan-girls." --- This blog is dedicated to movies and the entertainment industry. We use random selection to bring into light the best and worst of streaming films and entertainment news.
Movie Name/Year: Midnight Peepshow (2024) Genre: Horror Length: 1h 33min Rating: Unrated Director: Airell Anthony Hayles, Andy Edwards, Jake West, Ludovica
Musumeci Actors: Zach Galligan, Chiara D’Anna, Richard Cotton, Sarah
Diamond, Jamie Bacon, Derek Nelson, Jack Fairbank. Miki Davis, Ryan Oliva,
Ocean M. Harris Blurb from IMDb: A man stumbles across a
darkly magical peepshow booth
Selina’s Point of View: In some ways, Midnight
Peepshow was everything I feared it would be… and yet, it’s also everything
I hoped. The trailer made Midnight
Peepshow seem like a sexy version of Saw (2004) – which is one of
the strangest comparisons I’ve ever made. It’s not exactly something I ever
thought I would, or wanted, to see. Still, the trailer looked good enough that
I considered putting it on my Top 20. It would have been about 21 or 22 – just missing
the cut. I knew there
would likely be a lot of unnecessary sex scenes. The title is a bit telling. In
that way, Midnight Peepshow was exactly as I feared. The sex scenes were
way too drawn out, especially since they weren’t all that in depth. It was just
one character bouncing on another. There was a bit of plot involved, but it was
visually boring. I’d also warn
that there are some triggering moments among those scenes, and you should stay
away from the film if that’s something that could be a problem for you.
What I didn’t
expect was the genre of Midnight Peepshow. It was not just a horror; it
was an anthology – complete with a framing device. Nothing in the trailer
prepared me for that. There’s some mention in the promotional materials about
there being more than one story, but not the way they were combined. The genre doesn’t
affect much except my perception. I happen to love a good anthology. Short
stories inside larger ones just do it for me. Maybe it’s the ADHD, but I almost
always wind up zoned in right up until the end. When I realized Midnight Peepshow
was an anthology, I found myself giving it even more attention. As it turned out,
there was some real story to it all. I enjoyed each part of the ‘black rabbit’
plot, including how it was all tied together. Perhaps it got a little
convoluted in the end, but even that felt like a decent conclusion. It felt as
if the convolution was appropriate, for lack of a better word. I enjoyed it, and
I’d watch it again. Midnight Peepshow was a competent horror anthology.
Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score – None Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score – None Metascore – None Metacritic User Score – None IMDB Score – 6.0/10 Trust the Dice: Selina’s Rating – 3.5/5 Trust the Dice: Cat’s Rating – 3/5 Trust-the-Dice’s
Parental Advisory Rating:
R Movie Trailer:
I’ve always found anthologies to be divisive among movie fans.
There are a lot of people that just don’t concern themselves with the genre at
all. The only anthology flicks most people tend to gravitate toward would be along
the lines of Love Actually (2003). It’s a film that flows like the recipe
of a typical rom-com. The framing device is something that is only really seen
for three minutes split between the beginning and the end, the rest of the film
plays out as if there’s no real anthology aspect to it. Most anthologies don’t tend to play to a wider theatrical
audience the way Love Actually does. They often have a different writer/director
for every segment. Sometimes each entry is even filmed in a different style. As
a result, a lot of people tend to steer clear. I tend to prefer anthologies that present themselves as they
are. I like a strong framing device that’s seen several times throughout the
flick, and stories that revolve around a main theme but are otherwise
completely different. Anthologies give a short look into the work of various
artists which helps me decide if they’re people I want to see more of. An
unfamiliar name in an anthology can introduce you to a whole new filmography of
work. A good anthology can even lead to several introductions. In my original personal cinematic landscape, I covered
anthologies of both styles. I wrote about New York, I Love You (2008)
and If These Walls Could Talk 2 (2000) – both anthologies that exhibit
the Love Actually style. I also discussed The Animatrix (2003)
and The ABCs of Death (2012) which are more like the latter description. There are two anthologies I’ve seen since the last look into
my cinematic landscape that deserve to be added in. Both for the exact same
reason: V/H/S/94 (2021) and The Mortuary Collection (2019).
The V/H/S series is pretty well known. Most of the
movies in it, however, aren’t all that memorable. Even those that have decent
reviews tend to get lost to history. Still, the found footage VHS tape framing
device – especially for the horror genre – is a stroke of genius. I think that’s
the reason the series has had so much staying power over the years. V/H/S/2 (2013) was the first of the series that I
greatly enjoyed, but it wasn’t until V/H/S/94 that it had any effect on
the way I perceived anthologies. Each of the various stories in V/H/S/94 kept me glued
to the screen. Even if they hadn’t, though, the framing device had its own interesting
story with its very own twist. It was so interesting that it held up to the short
stories being told throughout the rest of the flick.
In The Mortuary Collection that twist in the framing
device is more pronounced. In fact, I’d say the framing device is the best
story told in the entire film. It’s so memorable that I can replay it in my
head scene for scene even though I’ve only seen it once, several years ago. (I
looked it up to see if it really was something I remembered scene for scene –
and it is. So, I’ve seen it twice now.) The framing device being its very own story in an anthology
is something I believe could heighten the popularity of the genre. It feels
less like someone sitting there telling tales than other anthologies with the
same style tend to. It becomes almost like a game to try and figure out how
each short ties together – on their own and within the frame. It’s even better when the framing device has that ending
twist that turns everything on its head. It elevates even a mediocre anthology into
something worth watching – and recommending. I hope to see a great deal more of
that in the future.